Hamishi
Hamishi
@hamishi
Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 8, 2020
Last seen: Mar 13, 2020
Topics: 2 / Replies: 29
Reply
RE: Two laser troubles

I also installed a fan. No more CPU throttle warnings and crashes anymore.

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laser troubles

Besides that I still have a red and a green laser, I had some advancement in the scan results. I have my 3D printer kit up and running for a while and...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laser troubles

Dear Mario, Thanks for the response. I have to buy another green one I guess. Means another 30 days waiting for delivery from China. Regards, ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laser troubles

Hi, I recently installed a second laser. It is assumed to be an adjustable green line laser. I have no idea on how to adjust this thing. If I turn t...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Scan results not correct.

I changed it to 11, rebooted and calibrated again. The results improved a lot but still it looks that some parts of the surface are placed in the poin...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Scan results not correct.

actually it is 10.555 mm for 9 squares I measure 9.5 cm

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Scan results not correct.

@mario, I still cannot get decent results unfortunately. Could you have another look at the calibration results? I'm suspecting that the calibration p...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Scan results not correct.

@danilo0702 30.2 is the distance I measured from the table surface to the top of the first black square on the bottom row. This is the value according...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Scan results not correct.

@Mario As promised yesterday. The scan results have improved but are still not perfect. What did I do: 1. Realign the camera to cross the green li...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Scan results not correct.

@mario From that picture the table seems not to be exactly in the middle. I tried to align the centre of the table with the vertical green line as in ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Scan results not correct.

My camera alignment.

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Scan results not correct.

I use a PiCAM V2 (green circuit board) and did not change any resolution.

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Scan results not correct.

The black background is a piece of an anti-slip foil used in car boots to avoid things slipping around in the boot. I just placed it behind the table ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Scan results not correct.

The requested screenshots. The rotation axis problem for a new scan seems to emerge after loading a saved scan as I did to produce this screenshots.

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Scan results not correct.

The requested screenshots. The rotation axis problem for a new scan seems to emerge after loading a saved scan as I did to produce this screenshots.

4 years ago
Reply
RE: My FabScanPi with some improvements

Hi Mario, The picture of the fabscanpi HAT should be placed in the topic about the configuration for a 400 step motor and the TMC2208 driver as this p...

4 years ago
Topic
Replies: 17
Views: 4299
Reply
RE: My FabScanPi with some improvements

When you look at the picture you can see that I had to skew the camera quite a lot. The nuts on the other side don't have any space between them. I ca...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: My FabScanPi with some improvements

This picture shows the pads C1 and C2 connected to 5V.

4 years ago
Reply
RE: My FabScanPi with some improvements

My calibration sheet fabricated from PCB. The camera adjustment by means of M3x16 bolts and nuts. My camera was way off. The support for the sides to ...

4 years ago
Topic
Replies: 10
Views: 1505
Reply
RE: Configuration for 400 step Motor

Thanks to all of you, I think this was a good exercise. I also did some modification to the camera mounting as it was not aligned with the table and ...

4 years ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Configuration for 400 step Motor

Yes, I just tested it. Under the driver there are three of these jumper pads, label C3, C2, and C1. First I verified which of them are connected to MS...

4 years ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Configuration for 400 step Motor

So on the FabScanPi Hat J7 2 and 3 should be closed and J8 2 and 3 should be closed for a 2208 to pull them to 5V.

4 years ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Configuration for 400 step Motor

@Mario, Can you confirm, that these pins are not driven by the software. From your replay above it seems to me that for the 21xx the default values re...

4 years ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Configuration for 400 step Motor

From the comparison between the 2100 and the 2208 I observe that when the 2100 setting for 1/16 is applied to a 2208 it would probably result in 1/8. ...

4 years ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Configuration for 400 step Motor

Just looked at the minicom post. The GO[T(400)] command would turn a 400 step motor 360 degrees and a 200 step motor 720 degrees. I'm not sure if I wr...

4 years ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Configuration for 400 step Motor

I took a look at that post right now. According to the schematic, I think that with MS1 and MS2 at VCC the motor makes 16 steps, not 1/16. So it is, ...

4 years ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Configuration for 400 step Motor

I just built the kit this week and used according to the documentation the setting 6400 for the 400 step motor. The documentation of the motor claims...

4 years ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Configuration for 400 step Motor

@mcinerney I just build the kit this week and used according to the documentation the setting for a 6400 for the 400 step motor. The documentation of ...

4 years ago
Forum