iadegesso
iadegesso
@iadegesso
Eminent Member
Joined: Apr 13, 2019
Last seen: Mar 21, 2024
Topics: 4 / Replies: 27
Reply
RE: Twin laser: Bad scans

Here some result with a more heavy object (too tall, but not vibrating during rotation) Iade

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Twin laser: Bad scans

PS: I was thinking about the fact that the object can vibrate during the rotation of the scanning plate ... do you think it can affect the quality of ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Twin laser: Bad scans

Hi @mario , today I added a couple of passive heatsinks to the TMC2100 (the second one is just to enlarge the hot area coverage, even if I put the f...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Twin laser: Bad scans

Hi @mario , yes, it's the same object. I just switched from monocrome to colored scan in order to better understand what goes bad. Iade

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Twin laser: Bad scans

Hi @mario, here my default.config.json after the last (successful) calibration process, i.e., the one before the scan you can see in my previous mes...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Twin laser: Bad scans

Hi @mario yesterday I calibrated the voltage of the TMC 2100 to 0,71V (I was not able to understand if mime was the 2100 V1 or the 2100 V2 but I tr...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Twin laser: Bad scans

My last test, putting a dark towel on the scanner... I did it leaving checked the option to scan with colors... It's helpful!!! It seems that around...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Twin laser: Bad scans

Ok @mario, I checked the motor driver is a TMC2100-LA, the black PCB version... so I think it is the model that handle 3-5V. The motor should ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Twin laser: Bad scans

Hi @mario, first of all, thanks and a small errata corrige... but yesterday I was a bit fused and the correct stepper motor model is NEMA 17HM34...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Twin laser: Bad scans

I think my problem is the same described here... And, as @yhellowt, I'm using the latest 0.10.x aka 0.10.2 version of FabScan-Server Iade

2 years ago
Reply
RE: "Shadow" in scan

Same problem for me (here my setting: )... Iade Gesso, PhD (in Computer Science)

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Twin laser: Bad scans

This is the secon lader point cloud

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Twin laser: Bad scans

I cannot understand why pictures have not been uploaded...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Twin laser: Bad scans

@danilo0702 yes, it's yet in the default config file

2 years ago
Topic
Replies: 17
Views: 729
Reply
RE: Second Laser: when?

@mario any idea about the behaviour shown in the above posts?Calibretion seems to be done correctly... When I did them the scanner has no black inside...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Second Laser: when?

Ok, this was because I set the two lasers as "interleaved", copying it from the Cyclop configuration. But now... after successfully calibrating the ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Second Laser: when?

I forgot to mention that when I try to power on manually the led ring, in the log the following lines are added: 2020-02-06 11:33:43,526 - fabscan.sca...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Second Laser: when?

Hi Mario, I just connected the second laset to the FabScanPi HAT, but I need to manually activate it because when I go to the scan panel (in preview m...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Second Laser: when?

Hi @mario, this is a very good news. Is the new code available on GitHub? Best regards, Iade Gesso, PhD

5 years ago
Topic
Replies: 2
Views: 2387
Reply
RE: Second Laser: when?

I'm waiting a lot for it :) Iade

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Scan result loose parts of the original object

Hi @mario, I tryed to download the point cloud to use it directly in my local copy of Meshlab (I'm on a Gentoo system, connected to the Fabscan throug...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Scan result loose parts of the original object

Hi @mario, here the point cloud of the model I show you yesterday:/p> While waiting to have time to see the tutorial, I started setting the resoluti...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Scan result loose parts of the original object

Hi Mario, I followed your suggestion and I chacked my origin point. In the default configuration it was 37.2 but I lowered to 33 since i don't have th...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Scan result loose parts of the original object

UPDATE: I loaded the screenshots to an ImgBB album:/p> Bye

5 years ago
Topic
Replies: 14
Views: 4530
Reply
RE: RPi-Fabscan-Hat

Hey guys, this thread seems to be very interesting... it just seems to be because if it was written in English more people could contribute... Thank...

5 years ago